Sack Keates & Co Poll

[Vorporix]

Originally Posted by redinsaudi

The club got a couple of senior players (Pearson and Carra I think). To do interviews with the local comic, The Leader, to try and instigate a smoother path for DKs reemployment. Spencer knew this would not go down well but gave the job to his pal nonetheless.

This is so true but don't just pin it on Spencer.

The board(s) knew this would piss off a significant percentage of the fan base but went ahead anyway.

[WxmWynno]

Originally Posted by Colonel D

31 ?

The number who voted against knowing who the potential investors were
Posted via mobile theme

[redinsaudi]

Originally Posted by Vorporix

This is so true but don't just pin it on Spencer.

The board(s) knew this would piss off a significant percentage of the fan base but went ahead anyway.

Errr yes he did. He employed his mate again and asked Dixie to ratify it to further pull wool over fans eyes. It’s beyond ludicrous and I even think you know that pal.

[Jaded]

Originally Posted by redinsaudi

Errr yes he did. He employed his mate again and asked Dixie to ratify it to further pull wool over fans eyes. It’s beyond ludicrous and I even think you know that pal.

It is beyond ludicrous, but as V said, I don't see how it's solely Spencer's fault. Surely EVERYONE on the two boards should have realised how ridiculous it was?

[Vorporix]

Originally Posted by Jaded

It is beyond ludicrous, but as V said, I don't see how it's solely Spencer's fault. Surely EVERYONE on the two boards should have realised how ridiculous it was?

Thanks J - my point exactly - surely Spencer is not the only one with a vote!

[eosceiriog]

Originally Posted by Vorporix

Thanks J - my point exactly - surely Spencer is not the only one with a vote!

I agree entirely but I still would not want him involved in running our club under any new ownership.

[moynkeepthefaith]

Originally Posted by eosceiriog

I agree entirely but I still would not want him involved in running our club under any new ownership.

I think we can safely say that any well advised investors would look to make changes.

[redinsaudi]

Originally Posted by Vorporix

Thanks J - my point exactly - surely Spencer is not the only one with a vote!

My point is that he is the self proclaimed ‘face’ and spokesman of the board demonstrated dozens of times. Clambering over his peers at every positive media opportunity he is to the fore. He loves the limelight so must also accept the accountability for the negative too, surely??

[FieldtownRed]

Originally Posted by redinsaudi

My point is that he is the self proclaimed ‘face’ and spokesman of the board demonstrated dozens of times. Clambering over his peers at every positive media opportunity he is to the fore. He loves the limelight so must also accept the accountability for the negative too, surely??

I’d agree to this extent but on the flip side he appears to be the only one who sticks his head above the parapet. The only time you’d hear Pete Jones speaking would be from behind his pint glass at WST meeting. I’d struggle to recognise any of either of the current boards aside from Spencer due to their reluctance to speak out publicly.