SGM to be announced tomorrow

[redavid]

My Big worry is if they want to retain the board , after All what contacts do they have here apart from spencer and Co. ?
Did hear Rob mention becoming Chair at one point , But surely not ?

[dewi ogwen]

The deal must go ahead but I feel the name of the club has to be Wrexham in the future and the club has to remain playing in the town. Surely two red lines that are not negotiable.

[Wrexy]

Originally Posted by dewi ogwen

The deal must go ahead but I feel the name of the club has to be Wrexham in the future and the club has to remain playing in the town. Surely two red lines that are not negotiable.

100% agree with this. I’d also like to see us continue playing in red (and ideally without a massive blue sponsors logo on the shirt).

Aside from that anything goes.

[harrypothead]

Can someone please explain to me what this vote is for? Is it a vote between the board to say whether they are all in agreement of the deal before the Trust Members receive their packages and then able to vote yes or no? If not this what is it?

[Hamilton Pathetic]

Originally Posted by dewi ogwen

The deal must go ahead but I feel the name of the club has to be Wrexham in the future and the club has to remain playing in the town. Surely two red lines that are not negotiable.

Why would the investors think of moving the club, when they have had the opportunity to make a bid for a club anywhere in the UK? Surely the location would have been on one their considerations before approaching Wrexham.

[-luke]

Originally Posted by harrypothead

Can someone please explain to me what this vote is for? Is it a vote between the board to say whether they are all in agreement of the deal before the Trust Members receive their packages and then able to vote yes or no? If not this what is it?

This is the last vote. Basically here is the deal, do you want to accept

[Iesty]

Originally Posted by Rob

For clarity, I am not saying that.

I think the total opposite, the takeover is in the Suez Canal of process and has been long guided by various tugboats captains and pilots chugging along without issue, all with the joint aim to enter the sunlit uplands of the Mediterranean.

is that a hint to some Middle Eastern involvement?

[Iesty]

Originally Posted by harrypothead

Can someone please explain to me what this vote is for? Is it a vote between the board to say whether they are all in agreement of the deal before the Trust Members receive their packages and then able to vote yes or no? If not this what is it?

we dont know until they tell us what it is for! I imagine it will be once we have all had a chance to review the info pack then whether they want the WST to proceed with handing over the reins

[-luke]

Originally Posted by Iesty

we dont know until they tell us what it is for! I imagine it will be once we have all had a chance to review the info pack then whether they want the WST to proceed with handing over the reins

Pretty sure we know what the next vote is Iesty... The only spanner in the works as I see it is whether we vote in this SGM to remove the constitutional objects and then on the sale once the vision presentation made, or whether its the vision then a vote to remove the objects which would then have to be followed closely by a 3rd SGM to vote the same through.

I'm hoping it can just be done and dusted in one sitting though, I thought they explained the process during SGM 1 tbh