Bromley ratings
Strange game to rate given Lainton injury and impact on the game plus the fact we were shocking for 70 mins then played pretty well after the subs. Bromley have some v good players eg Cheek and Hackett and a point has to be a good outcome all things considered
Lainton 6 - speedy recovery Rob Horsfield 7 - solid and looked more of an attacking threat 2nd half Reckord 6 - some dodgy moments but grew into the game as did many others Kelleher 6 - reasonably assured but some hairy moments Vassell 5 - not sure what he was doing for the goal and didn't look comfortable at all v Alabi and Cheek Harris 5 - the midfield 2 really struggled to impose themselves at all Young 5 - as per Harris. For all his great goals and set pieces his general play leaves a lot to be desired at times Rutherford 6 - typical anonymous performance but then really intelligent ball into the box for our equaliser Jeffrey 3 - atrocious Thomas 5 - back to the Thomas of a few weeks ago rather than the one v Sutton Yussuf 6 - quiet most of the game but well take goal and could've had another in last 15 mins Subs Dibble 8 - perhaps could have done a bit better with the goal but otherwise a revelation and kept us in the game single handedly at times Durrell 7 - added some intelligence and creativity to our midfield play Davies 7 - looked lively |
Re: Bromley ratings
Dibble 8!?!
Kept us in the game. He was awesome |
[QUOTE=The Method Maws;2414024]Dibble 8!?!
Kept us in the game. He was awesome[/QUOTE] That’s why he got an 8 that’s a v high score! [size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size] |
Re: Bromley ratings
lainton 7
dibble 9 horsfield 6 kellerher 6 vassel 6 reckord 6 jeffrey 6 yousuff 8 harris 7 young 6.5 - silly foul Ruthers 7.5 greatt chip for goal thomas 7 davies and Durrel 7 Keates 8.5 for substutitions paramedics 10 commentrary and streaming 10 |
Re: Bromley ratings
Lainton 6 - a needless injury. Maybe they will change the stupid offside rule now. Hoping Rob makes a speedy recovery. On the team bus going home apparently.
Horsfield 7 - thought he was decent in both halves, got forward when he could Reckord 7 - I keep hearing he has a wand of a left foot, but whereas he gets forward well, his delivery could be better Kelleher 7 - kept it together when we could have caved in. Vassell 6 - people blaming Dibble for the goal but Vassell just let him take a 2nd shot Harris 5 - Jay is not the force he was and the game seemed to pass him by Young 6 - linked up well and kept taking us forward especially when Durrell and Davies came on Rutherford 6 - agree with Ben - typical anonymous performance but then sets up our equaliser Jeffrey 3 - sorry not for me, he couldn't pass to a red shirt on times Thomas 6 - put himself about a bit but was on his own for long periods. Yussuf 6 - frustrating because he is lethal in the box but all too often his control lets him down. Subs Dibble 8 - great block before the goal but was let down by his defenders. Otherwise very good and my MOTM Durrell 7 - all that Jeffrey wasn't Davies 7 - why aren't we playing Jordan on the left hand side of midfield - we would be much better balanced. Great to see us fight back and with a bit of luck could have had a winner. The game will be remembered for Rob Lainton's injury and i hope he is soon well enough to be back between the sticks |
Re: Bromley ratings
Dibble MoM - could be the making of him. We’ll need him in the coming games
Yussuf - I think there’s quality there if it’s worked on. Thomas - likewise Jeffrey - omg |
Re: Bromley ratings
[QUOTE=dragon48;2414049]Dibble MoM - could be the making of him. We’ll need him in the coming games
Yussuf - I think there’s quality there if it’s worked on. Thomas - likewise Jeffrey - omg[/QUOTE] I have seen enough of Dibble to know it won’t b the making of him, absolutely useless. |
Re: Bromley ratings
Dibble excellent showing and must have been difficult to get involved after seeing Lainton in that way. Kept us in the game with two outstanding saves... Well done sir !
|
Re: Bromley ratings
[QUOTE=OneLoveWrexham;2414067]I have seen enough of Dibble to know it won’t b the making of him, absolutely useless.[/QUOTE]
He is ok and why spend money on a reserve keeper who never plays ? He is fine as a sub or to play for a few games and of ever we need more than that a keeper is the easiest position to procure on loan. I dont know why some fans want to spend scarce money on a good goalkeeper sub who might rarely play. |
Re: Bromley ratings
Special mention to that ball in towards the end that was narrowly missed by Rutherford. Was a special ball that... A forward with a bit of height and we are taking 3 points home.
|
Re: Bromley ratings
[QUOTE=Foxy;2414084]He is ok and why spend money on a reserve keeper who never plays ? He is fine as a sub or to play for a few games and of ever we need more than that a keeper is the easiest position to procure on loan. I dont know why some fans want to spend scarce money on a good goalkeeper sub who might rarely play.[/QUOTE]
I can’t see the new owners being satisfied with a reserve keeper simply employed because he’s “fine to sit on the bench” or “he’s cheap”. The nonsense is nearly over. |
Re: Bromley ratings
[QUOTE=Foxy;2414084]He is ok and why spend money on a reserve keeper who never plays ? He is fine as a sub or to play for a few games and of ever we need more than that a keeper is the easiest position to procure on loan. I dont know why some fans want to spend scarce money on a good goalkeeper sub who might rarely play.[/QUOTE]
I think peoples fears were justified by his performances in the games Lainton was absent last season - cost us quite a few points early on that wouldve been useful in keeping us away from the drop. That said, credit where credit is due, he earned us a good point today. |
Re: Bromley ratings
[QUOTE=OneLoveWrexham;2414067]I have seen enough of Dibble to know it won’t b the making of him, absolutely useless.[/QUOTE]
He may not be ideal, but he was hardly useless today. Did a very good job in difficult circumstances. I guess he’ll start on Tuesday, so we will need more of the same. Well done Christian! |
Re: Bromley ratings
[QUOTE=Foxy;2414084]He is ok and why spend money on a reserve keeper who never plays ? He is fine as a sub or to play for a few games and of ever we need more than that a keeper is the easiest position to procure on loan. I dont know why some fans want to spend scarce money on a good goalkeeper sub who might rarely play.[/QUOTE]
I think the commentators on Mixlr said it best that hes a confidence player. Could have been a different performance if he had come into the squad a few games back when we were being hammered. TBH after the Leighton injury and going one down i didn't think we would get anything from the match. For once Keates used subs early and effectivley. |
Re: Bromley ratings
[QUOTE=benwilliams;2414006]Strange game to rate given Lainton injury and impact on the game plus the fact we were shocking for 70 mins then played pretty well after the subs. Bromley have some v good players eg Cheek and Hackett and a point has to be a good outcome all things considered
Lainton 6 - speedy recovery Rob Horsfield 7 - solid and looked more of an attacking threat 2nd half Reckord 6 - some dodgy moments but grew into the game as did many others Kelleher 6 - reasonably assured but some hairy moments Vassell 5 - not sure what he was doing for the goal and didn't look comfortable at all v Alabi and Cheek Harris 5 - the midfield 2 really struggled to impose themselves at all Young 5 - as per Harris. For all his great goals and set pieces his general play leaves a lot to be desired at times Rutherford 6 - typical anonymous performance but then really intelligent ball into the box for our equaliser Jeffrey 3 - atrocious Thomas 5 - back to the Thomas of a few weeks ago rather than the one v Sutton Yussuf 6 - quiet most of the game but well take goal and could've had another in last 15 mins Subs Dibble 8 - perhaps could have done a bit better with the goal but otherwise a revelation and kept us in the game single handedly at times Durrell 7 - added some intelligence and creativity to our midfield play Davies 7 - looked lively[/QUOTE] A fair assessment. Harris looked a potential liability. Good assist from Rutherford. Jeffrey won't be here long under new regime. Durrell impressed in the limited time he had. Dibble was the main reason we came away with something. |
Re: Bromley ratings
Lainton 6
Horsfield 6 Kelleher 5 Vassell 5 Reckord 6 Young 6 Harris 5 Jeffrey 5 Rutherford 6 Thomas 6 Yussuf 7 Dibble 8 Durrell 7 Davies 6 |
Re: Bromley ratings
[QUOTE=NottsRed;2414141]I think the commentators on Mixlr said it best that hes a confidence player. Could have been a different performance if he had come into the squad a few games back when we were being hammered.
TBH after the Leighton injury and going one down i didn't think we would get anything from the match. For once Keates used subs early and effectivley.[/QUOTE] The use of subs before the 80th minute took me by surprise. Maybe Mr. Keates has finally seen that subs can influence a game |
Re: Bromley ratings
perhaps his timing was confused with all the stoppages.
|
All times are WMT (Wrexham Mean Time). For non-town viewers the time now is 10.10:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® & Wrex the Dragons fiery breath