Quote:
Originally Posted by fezbob
Under 'strengths', you've just put 'management' Dean. That's your job, though.
Under 'weaknesses', you've put 'eczema'.
|
That is a brilliant reference in this context. Bravo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huffy
I agree entirely Bux.
Mind you ,I would rather not have a moan about that because in all honesty ,most of us know the ones who have the problem with him !
I am not sticking up for him either ,as it has become clear to even me , his personality is somewhat distictly lacking , and the football served up speaks for itself and I will not be bothered if hes gone any time soon !
|
That's it, I don't need to read his LinkedIn and rip it to pieces to know he isn't up to it. He has a right to hawk for a job, I just wish it wasn't here. I don't have anything against him personally.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Attack
Do we know who was actually responsible for contacting employers? For me, that is utterly deplorable. I don't recall voting for that.
Whilst the inner circle of the Trust have been good at leaking secrets, perhaps they could leak who it was who contacting some employers of supporters.
Out of interest and merely trying to add balance to the argument; would it be fair if the LinkedIn profiles of supporters were posted and discussed on RP?
My view is that whilst it is all publicly accessible, it straddles the line. We only have to look at the league table and assess the team's performance to criticise the manager without pulling apart his LinkedIn profile too.
Finally, it wasn't Keates that was responsible for (alleged) personal attacks by the Trust on supporters. Perhaps the LinkedIn profiles of senior Trust members should be posted in the interests of fairness.
|
In terms of the "contacting employers" line, there are certainly two sides to that story, as with most stories of that nature.