Torquay ratings
Absolute sickener that, we were good value for a draw and were the better side 2nd half but we looked what we are ie a team with 1 forward.
Dibble 6 - very little to do, I'm not blaming him for the goal but would need to see it back RHJ 5 - my opinion on him goes backwards by the week. He's not actually that good is he? Terrible crossing and decision making French 7 - pretty much faultless Kelleher 6 - did well wasn't really troubled Carrington 5 - looked very edgy and sloppy in possession and decision making poor Reckord 5 - after looking better last few games he was back to sloppy and disinterested Young 6 - quiet, not his best game Harris 7 - again close to Mom closed them down well and put in a few great defensivetackles. Silly fouls on a few occasions Davies 7.5 MOM - v unlucky not to score, always looking to create and looked a threat, best ive seen him and growing into a fine player Jarvis 5 -glad he got his chance but blew it for me, too many wrong options and didn't look like he could affect the game Angus 6 - battled gamely and a few nice touches but he looks bereft without his strike partner Subs Rutherford 6 - surprisingly decent game and showed up better than Jarvis Pearson 4 -caused chaos in our box and to blame for the goal [size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size] |
Re: Torquay ratings
Reckord, 5 seriously?
|
Re: Torquay ratings
[QUOTE=benwilliams;2456528]Absolute sickener that, we were good value for a draw and were the better side 2nd half but we looked what we are ie a team with 1 forward.
Dibble 6 - very little to do, I'm not blaming him for the goal but would need to see it back RHJ 5 - my opinion on him goes backwards by the week. He's not actually that good is he? Terrible crossing and decision making French 7 - pretty much faultless Kelleher 6 - did well wasn't really troubled Carrington 5 - looked very edgy and sloppy in possession and decision making poor Reckord 5 - after looking better last few games he was back to sloppy and disinterested Young 6 - quiet, not his best game Harris 7 - again close to Mom closed them down well and put in a few great defensivetackles. Silly fouls on a few occasions Davies 7.5 MOM - v unlucky not to score, always looking to create and looked a threat, best ive seen him and growing into a fine player Jarvis 5 -glad he got his chance but blew it for me, too many wrong options and didn't look like he could affect the game Angus 6 - battled gamely and a few nice touches but he looks bereft without his strike partner Subs Rutherford 6 - surprisingly decent game and showed up better than Jarvis Pearson 4 -caused chaos in our box and to blame for the goal [size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size][/QUOTE] Can't argue with that tbf |
Re: Torquay ratings
Didnt watch or listen to the match as I am accepting our fate for this season and preparing myself for next season.
But an observation of the team and subs today and whether they should be kept for our promotion push. In my opinion only the following should be kept. French Kelleher Young Davies Angus and Pearson ( also I would keep Vassell and Thomas) |
Re: Torquay ratings
pearson is finished. young not good enough.
|
Re: Torquay ratings
Harris , Kelleher and Davies best three on day
Rutherford did well when came on Everyone else bang average or less |
Re: Torquay ratings
[QUOTE=welshian;2456536]pearson is finished. young not good enough.[/QUOTE]
Hahaha best thing I’ve read all year. He was class vs Bromley & good vs Notts county. But after today he’s finished? Moron |
Re: Torquay ratings
The 5 given for Reckord was 4 more than he deserved, his attitude stinks.
|
Re: Torquay ratings
[QUOTE=Legspinner;2456598]The 5 given for Reckord was 4 more than he deserved, his attitude stinks.[/QUOTE]
Man, he is poor. Almost, like, he can't possibly be as bad as I think he is. Bizarre. |
All times are WMT (Wrexham Mean Time). For non-town viewers the time now is 18.44:25. |
Powered by vBulletin® & Wrex the Dragons fiery breath