iFollow

[WAFCExile]

It’s been great getting highlights for free, but £30 is only just over 50p per game. That’s a pretty good deal, especially for people like me who can’t regularly get to games. When you sign up it gives you the impression that live streaming might be possible for an additional payment. I hope that’s the case.

[Yeoman204]

Originally Posted by TopCornerFergie

It sounds exactly the same as the Wrexham Player that we used to have in the Football League. What's the big deal?

The standard of the video was pretty bad on Wrexham Player as it was downscaled. Quality was way higher once it moved to YouTube. Was the right decision at the time to move away from Player. As long as that’s been addressed, then fine.

[Funny_Old_Game]

Originally Posted by northwalian dragon

The quality of the videos would have to improve tenfold if it's becoming a paid service. Even Saturdays highlights are dark and gloomy as if they were filmed through an ND filter

Saturdays highlights looked like they were filmed from space the camera was that far away.

[sparky]

Originally Posted by redknight

I'd probably pay for this as it's hard to come by decent content with us being non league but not if it's Mark Griffiths on the commentary and cringe interviews

Very much this.

[Hometown Unicorn]

Originally Posted by WAFCExile

It’s been great getting highlights for free, but £30 is only just over 50p per game. That’s a pretty good deal, especially for people like me who can’t regularly get to games. When you sign up it gives you the impression that live streaming might be possible for an additional payment. I hope that’s the case.

Live streaming isn't permitted is it?

[Kiddy Dragon]

Originally Posted by Hometown Unicorn

Live streaming isn't permitted is it?

Thats what has been said previously, BUT as the post you respond to says there is a footnote to subscribe to the highlights offer which reads
'These packages do not include access to live match streaming. Home match passes will be sold separately with away match passes available direct from the opposition club, where applicable.'

So what's the plan? Will all games be streamed or just midweek fixtures or what?

[Haruki]

Should the valid question be
a) Why are the new owners charging for this? or
b) Why weren't the WST charging for this?

I'm asking question B to be honest

[3pmsaturday]

Originally Posted by Haruki

Should the valid question be
a) Why are the new owners charging for this? or
b) Why weren't the WST charging for this?

I'm asking question B to be honest

It’s well known that people who say ‘to be honest’ probably either

a) are not being honest at that point
b) it’s the exception and they are not normally honest

Which one is it?

[Yeoman204]

Originally Posted by Haruki

Should the valid question be
a) Why are the new owners charging for this? or
b) Why weren't the WST charging for this?

I'm asking question B to be honest

They were for the first couple of years. The platform was pretty ropey and the video quality was poor at the time - was absolutely the right choice to ditch it. Hopefully it's improved since then.