CanuckWrexham
Training with First Team
While there's sort of some truth to what you say, I find most men (perhaps you, perhaps not) are complete BS when it comes to this logic.Women's football is growing in this country and it's great to see so many young girls playing, my youngest daughter loves it. However, it needs to grow naturally imo and I feel, at times, it feels like its forced a little bit.
You now get main headlines on bbc football when if we're honest, there's more interest in National league football, at the moment.
I also feel they need to completely separate men and women football, like they do in every other sport. For example, I read the other day a female English player is seen as the top scorer for England, ahead of Alan Shearer. Sorry but that's bullshit, in women's football fair play, but don't compare, you can't for many reasons. You don't hear people compare Roger Federer and Serena Williams. Both should be resepected equally but never compared. Mens/Women 100 meter runners are respected equally but never compared.
Anyway, I feel R&R have done a tremendous amount of work with women's football and should be applauded for their efforts.
If a woman is dominant in her category, they'll say "well she's still not as strong as a man". Fine, true.
But when someone like Khabib Nurmagomedov (MMA fighter) is talked about as so dominant, I don't hear the discourse saying "for his arbitrary weight category". I'd like people to just be consistent. If people are going to knock women for being in a 'women's category' then do the same thing for other artificial groupings. If people say Khabib is a great, then women can be great as their category too and should be given similar respect. Its the same logic; grouping people by genetic differences.