Quote:
Originally Posted by John Neals Dynasty
Well you have followed it up with an equally brilliant post sums up my thoughts to, just one thing I disagree on Nationalisation of the railways works abroad unlike our over priced privatised to make shareholders rich system, but that's another subject.
Posted via mobile theme
|
It’s constant people telling us how much we need them to reinforce the trust ownership, people stating we would need X amount of money to function, or John mills stating it would cost 50k for what he apparently does. So all these other clubs higher in the league table and leagues above who are operating under financial FairPlay might I add .... are paying what was it “quay red” said £200k or was it £400k to replace the board room “talent”.
Which is obviously utter bollocks just to tell people they are needed, in all honesty anyone who states “the club has never been ran better” needs to take a look at final league standings and the tiny profit amounts to nothing it’s all jargon to make it seem successful.
Any interest from outside is rejected at the point of contact, nothing materialises because the board room do not correspond, if they can ignore questions from the fans they were elected to represent there will be no issues with ignoring investment.
Pains me to say it but this is what happens with to many chiefs driven by ideology a catastrophe from top to bottom this club stinks, and the fact they haven’t even stepped down shows SH and PJ don’t plan on doing so. Horne and Bircham left the day after an appointment for a reason because they couldn’t work with the idiots running the show.