Quote:
Originally Posted by krux
again, this misses the point on the money. Its not about how much we spend, its about how good and the impact that expensive player has.
If we sign a midfielder in January and for arguments sake spend £1m on a transfer fee, and pay them £25k a week then you would expect them to be better than Luke Young , say. if they weren't you would not be happy.
If they are better than luke young and lead us to promotion, then you wouldn't worry that we paid £1m for them when really they are only 'worth' £50k or whatever.
|
No it doesn’t. We’ve spent money on tozer. He’s better than Pearson, who would have cost less. I don’t think there is much more to say.