Quote:
Originally Posted by moynkeepthefaith
Angry words Phil which are for sure not groundless. However I cannot condone things that will hurt the club like ceasing sponsorship. I know why you want to do it - and of course its your right not to sponsor but not to remove my option from within RP. We should better channel our energies to presenting the board with a collection of coherent questions for the AGM. I always suspected last night would be a stich up and so it proved. The AGM is the right place. At this stage of the season the only thing we can do is to get behind the team and BH and hope for a miracle - nothing else is going to happen anyway and we all know that.
Even if we get the miracle - questions need to be asked.
The big question is how to separate fact from fiction but without feedback from those in charge that is impossible.
|
The AGM is not the appropriate vehicle through which to question the Board on what’s happened in the Barrow, Lawrence, Barrow and Newell, Hughes debacle.
If, as some say it’s caused a rift between fans, it is up to those that feel aggrieved to call for an Extraordinary General Meeting, in accordance with the constitution, whatever that may be (x no of members, y % of members). I don’t know what the exact mechanics are in the case of WST, but if a group feel strong enough about things they should do their own research and work towards it.
It goes without saying that only Trust Members can call for such a meeting, so those thinking of resigning their membership need to bear that in mind if they are looking for explanations or changes to be made. Resigning will only hurt the Club and take away whatever voice you have.