Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

Fondop actually had a really good record for us. Based on what we know of Stockton so far is he any worse?

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=KingBuxton_Forever red;2230567]Fondop actually had a really good record for us. Based on what we know of Stockton so far is he any worse?[/QUOTE]

5 goals in 23 appearances is hardly inspiring. Granted, probably half of those were off the bench. We could do with Oswell fit and ready asap.

MFT more of a nuiscance than Stockton, though.

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=CRUMBS;2230552]Why leave out a new player , he's hardly had a chance , it must knock him back a bit after signing , you would think Oswell would be the man in the box to finish .[/QUOTE]

agreed

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=CRUMBS;2230557]Oh dear not allowed an opinion now then am i , what do you think everybody else does on here , touchy git . Grow up it ain't your club you know .[/QUOTE]

Very sad that you can't read my post as it was intended.
There were a lot of players missing from the squad last Saturday. Not everyone can play and Bryan Hughes has hardly had a chance to assess them all. The changes made were probably down to the rest of the management team. Tollit in for the departed Pyke and Perm 1 from 3 or 4 for the second place. Stockton got the nod last Saturday and appeared anonymous.

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

Fondop must have said something to be frozen out.
I dont understand why he hasnt gone out on loan.

Stockton is no better than Fondop and too early to know if Oswell is either.
Tollit gives the team something extra but as yet none of the others do.

Lets hope BH can shuffle well :)

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=pagl;2230591]Fondop must have said something to be frozen out.
I dont understand why he hasnt gone out on loan.

Stockton is no better than Fondop and too early to know if Oswell is either.
Tollit gives the team something extra but as yet none of the others do.

Lets hope BH can shuffle well :)[/QUOTE]

I suspect you are right, Fondop have done or said something. Although surely that is now a clean slate with Hughes coming in?

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=KingBuxton_Forever red;2230592]I suspect you are right, Fondop have done or said something. Although surely that is now a clean slate with Hughes coming in?[/QUOTE]

Unless he is being advised to the contrary.
He didnt mention Fondop in his comments but did others.

There is something not quite right.

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

I suspect the team on Saturday would of been picked by Darlington and Jussi in the main or advised Hughes who to play, he can't of made his mind up in 2 days seeing them train, from what I seen of Stockton and it was the first time I've seen him play or should I say stand about I would send him back and try and extend Tollets loan until the end of the season. He is raw makes lots of wrong decisions but has the confidence and pace to run at defenders. He looks very unfit understandably when he hasn't played much. So he will be a good threat the fitter he gets.

Oswell looked like he could come good he put himself about in the short spell he had coming on last time we played and like Tollet won't get fitter and sharper not playing as we have no reserves.

But I think a few are getting carried away after another 1-0 win it so easily could of been a draw because our poor finishing, even the goal was a scramble
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size]

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

Can we actually extend Tollitt's loan until the end of the season now after two month long loans? I was under the impression that once that happens you can only do another month long loan...unless I'm wrong and it was never like that or it has changed!

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=Ooh aah Paskin;2230615]Can we actually extend Tollitt's loan until the end of the season now after two month long loans? I was under the impression that once that happens you can only do another month long loan...unless I'm wrong and it was never like that or it has changed![/QUOTE]

We can have him for another month and that's it.

IMO we should have done a half-season loan in January. However considering what's been going on and Pyke going back I can see why Tranmere would have been reluctant.

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=John Neals Dynasty;2230601]I suspect the team on Saturday would of been picked by Darlington and Jussi in the main or advised Hughes who to play, he can't of made his mind up in 2 days seeing them train, from what I seen of Stockton and it was the first time I've seen him play or should I say stand about I would send him back and try and extend Tollets loan until the end of the season. He is raw makes lots of wrong decisions but has the confidence and pace to run at defenders. He looks very unfit understandably when he hasn't played much. So he will be a good threat the fitter he gets.

Oswell looked like he could come good he put himself about in the short spell he had coming on last time we played and like Tollet won't get fitter and sharper not playing as we have no reserves.

But I think a few are getting carried away after another 1-0 win it so easily could of been a draw because our poor finishing, even the goal was a scramble
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size][/QUOTE]
How can you say our goal was a scrambled one,the ball from Jennigs was cracking pass and Young got on the end of it and the keeper made a great save but could only palm it out where Beavon whacked it in,hardly scrambled was it

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=pjwales;2230704]How can you say our goal was a scrambled one,the ball from Jennigs was cracking pass and Young got on the end of it and the keeper made a great save but could only palm it out where Beavon whacked it in,hardly scrambled was it[/QUOTE]

I agree, that was a good goal. Excellent cross, Young did well to get the shot on target, a good save and fell nicely for Beavon who finished with aplomb.

Why can't some people give the team any credit for anything? You'll start hearing the "We're in a false position" line being trotted out soon, usually said by the same people who say "the table doesn't lie" when we have been in poor league positions.

I wasn't at the game but it seemed from the radio and the highlights that we had plenty of opportunities to put the game beyond them, and Lainton wasn't really troubled.

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=EnglishRed;2230705]I agree, that was a good goal. Excellent cross, Young did well to get the shot on target, a good save and fell nicely for Beavon who finished with aplomb.

Why can't some people give the team any credit for anything? You'll start hearing the "We're in a false position" line being trotted out soon, usually said by the same people who say "the table doesn't lie" when we have been in poor league positions.

I wasn't at the game but it seemed from the radio and the highlights that we had plenty of opportunities to put the game beyond them, and Lainton wasn't really troubled.[/QUOTE]

You weren’t at the game but you sum it up well. Second half we mullered them. Goal was well made and well taken.

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=moynkeepthefaith;2230713]You weren’t at the game but you sum it up well. Second half we mullered them. Goal was well made and well taken.[/QUOTE]

The goal was a combination of 3 good things.
Firstly Jennings ball, low and across the 6 yard box behind the defenders, then Youngs positioning at the back post to get in the first shot and finally Beavon being where a good striker should be.

If only we could get similar crosses from the right or other players.
All this lofting aimless high balls isnt creative.

Attacking the back post at corners, FKs and crosses will result in more chances.
Not many players are good enough to do this.

Make sure one if the front 3 attacks the 6 yard box when the ball goes in.

Basics, basics, basics.

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=pagl;2230714]The goal was a combination of 3 good things.
Firstly Jennings ball, low and across the 6 yard box behind the defenders, then Youngs positioning at the back post to get in the first shot and finally Beavon being where a good striker should be.

If only we could get similar crosses from the right or other players.
All this lofting aimless high balls isnt creative.

Attacking the back post at corners, FKs and crosses will result in more chances.
Not many players are good enough to do this.

Make sure one if the front 3 attacks the 6 yard box when the ball goes in.

Basics, basics, basics.[/QUOTE]

i think weve found our assistant manager

for yozzer,

come on pagl you get my vote

[QUOTE=pjwales;2230704]How can you say our goal was a scrambled one,the ball from Jennigs was cracking pass and Young got on the end of it and the keeper made a great save but could only palm it out where Beavon whacked it in,hardly scrambled was it[/QUOTE]



I accept having looked at it again it wasn't a scramble I didn't at the game get a good view as some knob stood up infront of me as it came to Beavon... Yes it was a good finish.

Having said that the rest of my post is true Wright alone missed 4 of which 3 were easier to score than miss, Dagenham were dreadful on Saturday.

But it's not our home form that's the problem that's what I meant by getting carried away.
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size]

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=EnglishRed;2230705]I agree, that was a good goal. Excellent cross, Young did well to get the shot on target, a good save and fell nicely for Beavon who finished with aplomb.

Why can't some people give the team any credit for anything? You'll start hearing the "We're in a false position" line being trotted out soon, usually said by the same people who say "the table doesn't lie" when we have been in poor league positions.

I wasn't at the game but it seemed from the radio and the highlights that we had plenty of opportunities to put the game beyond them, and Lainton wasn't really troubled.[/QUOTE]

If we lose we were poor. If we win the opposition were poor.

[QUOTE=marinman;2230760]If we lose we were poor. If we win the opposition were poor.[/QUOTE]


Did you go Saturday?
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size]

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=pagl;2230714]The goal was a combination of 3 good things.
Firstly Jennings ball, low and across the 6 yard box behind the defenders, then Youngs positioning at the back post to get in the first shot and finally Beavon being where a good striker should be.

If only we could get similar crosses from the right or other players.
All this lofting aimless high balls isnt creative.

Attacking the back post at corners, FKs and crosses will result in more chances.
Not many players are good enough to do this.

Make sure one if the front 3 attacks the 6 yard box when the ball goes in.

Basics, basics, basics.[/QUOTE]

Your right in what you say. If we could double per match the amount of quality balls we put into the box the law of averages says we will score more. do that and get the strikers sitting on top of the keeper

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=John Neals Dynasty;2230762]Did you go Saturday?
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size][/QUOTE]

Every Saturday. You?

Re: Reaction vs Dag and Red
 

[QUOTE=marinman;2230760]If we lose we were poor. If we win the opposition were poor.[/QUOTE]

If I had a pound every time I have heard that excuse I would be a millionaire.

[QUOTE=marinman;2230845]Every Saturday. You?[/QUOTE]



Every time we're at home and some away, so you go to every game home and away? I salute you and all supporters who do that, I couldn't afford to do that on my pension
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size]

[QUOTE=dagg;2230846]If I had a pound every time I have heard that excuse I would be a millionaire.[/QUOTE]



So just for clarification are you saying Dagenham played well Saturday?
[size=1][i]Posted via mobile theme[/i][/size]