Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=Phils-an-alki;2328688]Maybe you or Method could give us an insight on why they didn't 'interact' with certain fans with certain questions then?[/QUOTE]

I prefer to interact with both boards at members meetings or at the AGM but the idea of a Q and A is a good one.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=The Method Maws;2328699]They were submitted by fans. You complained that all the questions were not answered. But then complain about some that were answered.[/QUOTE]

So what?
Answering a question like why didn't they host a Euro 2016 party and then not answering any of Northwalian Dragons or Baggers far more pertinent questions tells you everything you need to know about these frauds.
Shouldn't have to explain this stuff.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=Inside Left;2328701]I prefer to interact with both boards at members meetings or at the AGM but the idea of a Q and A is a good one.[/QUOTE]

Didn't answer the question.I agree the idea is a good one, shame that in practice it was a complete whitewash.

They are so predictable and cowardly.

Any fan that actually supports this sort of whitewash is also part of the problem.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

Like or hate it. I think Red Passion is the biggest collection of Wrexham fans.

We may not all have the same view point but we certainly have the loudest voice. Why don't we collate a list of RP questions (say 40-50) . And put them to the club as one piece of work where everyone has full visability. That way every question has to be answered and they cant be cherry picked.

We can then put our collective weight behind this ensure they're all addressed. They may decide they can't answer them. But atleast they can't ignore them.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=LWR;2328710]Like or hate it. I think Red Passion is the biggest collection of Wrexham fans.

We may not all have the same view point but we certainly have the loudest voice. Why don't we collate a list of RP questions (say 40-50) . And put them to the club as one piece of work where everyone has full visability. That way every question has to be answered and they cant be cherry picked.

We can then put our collective weight behind this ensure they're all addressed. They may decide they can't answer them. But atleast they can't ignore them.[/QUOTE]

Er its already been done and they refused.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=LWR;2328710]Like or hate it. I think Red Passion is the biggest collection of Wrexham fans.

We may not all have the same view point but we certainly have the loudest voice. Why don't we collate a list of RP questions (say 40-50) . And put them to the club as one piece of work where everyone has full visability. That way every question has to be answered and they cant be cherry picked.

We can then put our collective weight behind this ensure they're all addressed. They may decide they can't answer them. But atleast they can't ignore them.[/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.redpassion.co.uk/forums/wrexham/115088-2019-year-review.html[/url]

Already did start that up, two days later the board announced this Q&A and gave the fans less than 24 hours to submit questions in which they, or Carl Hogan, could choose which questions to answer. Like why can't we make the seats more red as opposed to why wasn't Manny Smith's new contract announced?

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=LWR;2328710]Like or hate it. I think Red Passion is the biggest collection of Wrexham fans.

We may not all have the same view point but we certainly have the loudest voice. Why don't we collate a list of RP questions (say 40-50) . And put them to the club as one piece of work where everyone has full visability. That way every question has to be answered and they cant be cherry picked.

We can then put our collective weight behind this ensure they're all addressed. They may decide they can't answer them. But atleast they can't ignore them.[/QUOTE]

That’s exactly what NWD WAS doing; they did a great job of ignoring them.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=northwalian dragon;2328713][url]http://www.redpassion.co.uk/forums/wrexham/115088-2019-year-review.html[/url]

Already did start that up, two days later the board announced this Q&A and gave the fans less than 24 hours to submit questions in which they, or Carl Hogan, could choose which questions to answer. Like why can't we make the seats more red as opposed to why wasn't Manny Smith's new contract announced?[/QUOTE]

Apologies I didnt realise they were pooled questions. With so many threads its been hard to follow

[QUOTE=Phils-an-alki;2328711]Er its already been done and they refused.[/QUOTE]

I think we need to draft a generic email that we can all send individually to address why they were refused. We need to put our collective weight behind this to ensure every single one of NWD questions are answered.

Re: Q&A REVIEW | Your thoughts, was your question answered?
 

[QUOTE=Phils-an-alki;2328688]Maybe you or Method could give us an insight on why they didn't 'interact' with certain fans with certain questions then?[/QUOTE]

That's the first questions we need answers for. It was either Karl Hogan moderating the questions and choosing which to send to the board or the board received them all and chose to answer which questions.

Give I've asked Carl the same three questions:

[QUOTE=]Can you confirm whether all questions that were submitted for the Q&A were forwarded to the operation board or did you, in your role as media team manager, moderate and select which questions were submitted to board members?

Were any questions not submitted to the board to answer? If there were questions not put forward, how many?

Are there any of the 81 questions that I submitted, on behalf of myself and several other supporters, that you would like to answer yourself?[/QUOTE]

He refused to answer the questions on three seperate occasions and escalated my emails to a member of the operational board