Director updates on twitter

[Hometown Unicorn]

Originally Posted by FieldtownRed

Surely within the WST constitution there's a code of conduct for directors? If any of this is even remotely true, he must be in contempt of this code?

He covers his tracks very carefully. Uses VPNs to mask his internet activity.

[chef1]

I’d say everyone one of them has neglected their duty to the playing side of things .

[Teifi Red]

Originally Posted by Hometown Unicorn

He covers his tracks very carefully. Uses VPNs to mask his internet activity.

Can’t be that careful. He’s been rumbled by at least two posters. Could a dossier of these claims be put together?
Then presented with an ultimatum. Walk or it will be published.
The potential damage would have to result in action being taken by the board.

[Wenttoanderlechtin76]

Originally Posted by Teifi Red

Can’t be that careful. He’s been rumbled by at least two posters. Could a dossier of these claims be put together?
Then presented with an ultimatum. Walk or it will be published.
The potential damage would have to result in action being taken by the board.

Agree lets see them circle the wagons if this gets out !

[Teifi Red]

Originally Posted by Wenttoanderlechtin76

Agree lets see them circle the wagons if this gets out !

I don’t think they could in the face of such overwhelming evidence. Threatening people via employers, visiting home addresses. Coordinated gathering of “statements” presented to the boards with an ultimatum of sort it or it goes public.

[northwalian dragon]

Originally Posted by Teifi Red

I don’t think they could in the face of such overwhelming evidence. Threatening people via employers, visiting home addresses. Coordinated gathering of “statements” presented to the boards with an ultimatum of sort it or it goes public.

But there isn’t any evidence?

[Teifi Red]

Originally Posted by northwalian dragon

But there isn’t any evidence?

Reading the old “Corner Flag” thread and Phil’s an Alki comments would suggest otherwise. Hence the need to coordinate the incidents into one collective file of evidence.

[WrexhamO]

I think the only thing that could be called evidence was Rich Ulrich outing him on another forum for banning someone off there, who he said at the WST AGM had been stalking him. Rich said at the AGM he also blocked the same guy from the Club's official Twitter account.

Amazing John Mills replied to Rich that he also had access to the same Twitter account "so it could have been you."

Of course following that AGM John Mills was re-elected as WST vice-chair on a 50-50 vote, with the Chair's vote being the deciding factor.
WST minutes of 1st July 2019 states:
"VOTE: In a secret ballot, JM and SHH both received an equal number of votes therefore PJ used his casting vote as chair to appoint JM as Trust Vice Chair."

[GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo]

Originally Posted by northwalian dragon

It's John Mills. I haven't ever spoken to him, or dealt with him or had a personal problem with him. But every time there's a story like this, or the Neil Cooke one, or of whisper campaigns, or of slagging off the DSA it comes straight back to him.

For some bizzare reason Wrexham fans treat John Mills as Voldemort and never say his name

Very fond of starting legal action, certainly threatening it is my best guess why.