8 starts. and 2 sub apperences

[Alan Attack]

Originally Posted by FieldtownRed

Make your mind up.

If you're going to quote me, please use the whole quote and not just the opening sentence.

[Alan Attack]

Originally Posted by Funny_Old_Game

It’s lunchtime, he’s gone out for a walk. Back on shift just after 1pm.

KM Red doing graveyard shift tonight I’m hearing.
Posted via mobile theme

Lucky you're on here all day and night to monitor what's going on.

[Alan Attack]

Originally Posted by CRUMBS

This is typical Alan Attack must have said we need to move on four or five times now but gets involved in numerous debates over individuals lack of ability , comes to some sort of compromise in his head , says stuff that gets knocked for six , makes a statement which makes not much sense , thinks he's made the last comment on the subject , gets knocked back , tries to recover situation with another statement that gets knocked back , then says we need to move on . Repeat at will or when bored . On and on it goes .

It's quite simple really and this maybe a "compromise in his head" comment but I have repeatedly said Darlington should not be coaching our first team based on the performances of our first team whilst he has been a coach.

Based on his experience with the FAW, he'd be best suited in our (or someone else's) academy...if we had one. If that's wrong, so be it.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

It's quite simple really and this maybe a "compromise in his head" comment but I have repeatedly said Darlington should not be coaching our first team based on the performances of our first team whilst he has been a coach.

Based on his experience with the FAW, he'd be best suited in our (or someone else's) academy...if we had one. If that's wrong, so be it.

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

For what it's worth, I'd be more than happy with Keates, Davies and Darlington walked away tomorrow but that's not going to happen until the sale is completed.

[northwalian dragon]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

Do you think players and managers respect the fan-ownership structure compared to have a single entity/person making decisions?

It's not necessarily respecting the ownership model, but do they respect those on the board?

I've seen private messages sent from players that are absolutely savage against Spencer and other board members. One player said the club has a worse mentality than his brothers pub team. There's even been players that have rejected us because they've heard about the tinpot culture of the club. Even now players are turning up for training and are raging at the low standards we're setting.

The club is soaked in failure and that drips down from the very top. Players do need to be held to account but their hands are tied.

[Alan Attack]

Don’t change the subject, I’m winning this!

[ruthinred]

Originally Posted by northwalian dragon

It's not necessarily respecting the ownership model, but do they respect those on the board?

I've seen private messages sent from players that are absolutely savage against Spencer and other board members. One player said the club has a worse mentality than his brothers pub team. There's even been players that have rejected us because they've heard about the tinpot culture of the club. Even now players are turning up for training and are raging at the low standards we're setting.

The club is soaked in failure and that drips down from the very top. Players do need to be held to account but their hands are tied.

This nails it , blame should be apportioned to all quarters for the dismal failings we're seeing, the players should not be exempt

[Back of the Kop]

Originally Posted by ruthinred

This nails it , blame should be apportioned to all quarters for the dismal failings we're seeing, the players should not be exempt

In any walk of life, if a team is failing the manager is 100% accountable.

[TomWFC]

Originally Posted by Alan Attack

It's quite simple really and this maybe a "compromise in his head" comment but I have repeatedly said Darlington should not be coaching our first team based on the performances of our first team whilst he has been a coach.

Based on his experience with the FAW, he'd be best suited in our (or someone else's) academy...if we had one. If that's wrong, so be it.

So you don't rate him as a coach of a first team at a professional football club, yet you think he has some 'qualities' to teach other coaches how to coach - is that right?

Would love to know what these supposed 'qualities' are...