The league is there for the taking - build the budget January transfer window - Page 8 - RedPassion.co.uk

wxmdoug · 14th November 2017, 15.56:37

Hurst tweeted this afternoon :start of another week :
i dont think there is anything in it really.

for what its worth he is a good squad player and if he did not get injured he may well be our right back still as he looked more solid than Roberts who had a dip in form when keates put him on the bench .

TWREX · 14th November 2017, 15.59:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by wxmdoug

he is better than mackreth by a long way.

But he is a yellow card waiting to happen,quite the bully.

redrex · 14th November 2017, 16.02:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by TWREX

But he is a yellow card waiting to happen,quite the bully.

And in this league that's exactly what you need sometimes

TWREX · 14th November 2017, 16.05:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by redrex

And in this league that's exactly what you need sometimes

Agreed.

krux · 14th November 2017, 16.23:10

more bullies required!

Huffy · 14th November 2017, 16.45:57

Hurst has always seemed better when hes played a full game . A bit of a bully may be , but that gives him an edge IMO.
However , when hes come on as sub ,has struggled to fit in sometimes , but that happens I suppose.
I like him

Foxy · 14th November 2017, 19.04:57

He is one of three right backs and each of them is similar in standard. We can’t finance three right backs so one of them has to go. Given that Roberts has a two year contract and that Carrington is versatile, sadly it’s Hurst. But we shouldn’t have got into this situation ; having signed Hurst and kept Carrington, it’s a mystery why Keates paid a fee and gave a two year contract to another right back (Hurst ) who is no better. Really odd decision and the type of decision that should have led to the Board intervening.

jonesfach · 14th November 2017, 21.50:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foxy

He is one of three right backs and each of them is similar in standard. We can’t finance three right backs so one of them has to go. Given that Roberts has a two year contract and that Carrington is versatile, sadly it’s Hurst. But we shouldn’t have got into this situation ; having signed Hurst and kept Carrington, it’s a mystery why Keates paid a fee and gave a two year contract to another right back (Hurst ) who is no better. Really odd decision and the type of decision that should have led to the Board intervening.

He was signed as a utility player before we managed to prise Roberts away from Halifax. Either midfield or right back....Dean watched him play in midfield for Dover at Solihull?? And was hoping he would be a midfield ball winner for us.

A type of decision the board should have intervened in?? Give it a rest...that's a ridiculous thing to say.

pagl · 15th November 2017, 05.55:00

I dont think Hurst is that bad a player and would prefer to see hm at RM in front of Roberts.
He is far better than UB40 Mackreth.

The issue is an attitude one in training I hear.

14th November 2017, 15.56:37	#64-0 (permalink)
wxmdoug Legend Joined: Jul 2012 Racecourse Spot: exec box Real Name: dougie hughes Twitter: @	Re: The league is there for the taking - build the budget January transfer window Hurst tweeted this afternoon :start of another week : i dont think there is anything in it really. for what its worth he is a good squad player and if he did not get injured he may well be our right back still as he looked more solid than Roberts who had a dip in form when keates put him on the bench .

14th November 2017, 16.23:10	#68-0 (permalink)
krux Tipped As Manager Joined: Jul 2012 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: The league is there for the taking - build the budget January transfer window more bullies required!

14th November 2017, 16.45:57	#69-0 (permalink)
Huffy Due a Testimonial (info 1 & 2) Joined: Oct 2004 Racecourse Spot: Yale Kop end Real Name: Rip Van Winkle Twitter: @" what do you expect from a pig except a grunt "	Re: The league is there for the taking - build the budget January transfer window Hurst has always seemed better when hes played a full game . A bit of a bully may be , but that gives him an edge IMO. However , when hes come on as sub ,has struggled to fit in sometimes , but that happens I suppose. I like him __________________ Down with this sort of thing!!!

14th November 2017, 19.04:57	#70-0 (permalink)
Foxy Part Time ITV4 Pundit Joined: Dec 2011 Racecourse Spot: none given Real Name: none given Twitter: @	Re: The league is there for the taking - build the budget January transfer window He is one of three right backs and each of them is similar in standard. We can’t finance three right backs so one of them has to go. Given that Roberts has a two year contract and that Carrington is versatile, sadly it’s Hurst. But we shouldn’t have got into this situation ; having signed Hurst and kept Carrington, it’s a mystery why Keates paid a fee and gave a two year contract to another right back (Hurst ) who is no better. Really odd decision and the type of decision that should have led to the Board intervening.

15th November 2017, 05.55:00	#72-0 (permalink)
pagl Tipped As Manager (info 1 & 2) (info) Joined: Sep 2008 Racecourse Spot: Techend Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: The league is there for the taking - build the budget January transfer window I dont think Hurst is that bad a player and would prefer to see hm at RM in front of Roberts. He is far better than UB40 Mackreth. The issue is an attitude one in training I hear.