The silence is deafening

[Phils-an-alki]

Its the lager club clique. And they are all still supporting by their lunatic friends no matter what happens to the club. And this club claim they are fans. Laughable.

As long as the lager club clique are in power nothing else matters. They'd have walked this time last year if they had any self respect or cared about the club.

[sparky]

I wonder how many of the fundamentalists have read BV's earlier post and have chosen to ignore it?

[GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo]

Originally Posted by Phils-an-alki

Its the lager club clique. And they are all still supporting by their lunatic friends no matter what happens to the club. And this club claim they are fans. Laughable.

As long as the lager club clique are in power nothing else matters. They'd have walked this time last year if they had any self respect or cared about the club.

No chance, John Mills is desperately hoping for promotion before calling it quits and selling his WrexhamAFC twitter handle to the club.

If he cared it would've been swapped some time ago.

[Back of the Kop]

Now I've heard on the other thread rumours that we are signing kids from Stoke to rescue the club from the most perilous state of its 156 years I'm now convinced that the lunatics are taking us over the edge and the whole thing is going with them.

It's now too late for any change to filter through to the pitch so we have to sit and watch our club die.

They've proved to be much more dangerous than Hamilton as he was easier to move when he threatened the club's existence as he was one man but this is a cult.You get rid of one and another just slips into place

RIP Wrexham FC

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by sparky

I wonder how many of the fundamentalists have read BV's earlier post and have chosen to ignore it?

Todd Sweeny - disappeared off here. I can't think why though?

[Rob]

Originally Posted by Bagger Vance

When we proposed at the outset a separate minority shareholding (with the support of the then Chairman who was in favour of duality and resigned shortly after) to enable the purchase of the ground with the club it was shot down in flames by Peter and the rest of the board. It was 100% only even if that meant not getting the ground. Hence the ground went to Glyndwr and the rest is history. With little effort we had 3 people come forward with £150k, £50k and £150k interested (including the exile who stepped forward at the last minute to cover the bond gap). No effort then was made to explore or welcome alternative minority investment vehicles (which would have left the Trust in majority control but given handy oversight) so why would it have changed, if anything it seems more entrenched than ever.

Possibly different thread needed but got any fag packet maths on what the situation plus ten years would be?

100k pa rent to glyndwr v what?

[LlayDragon]

Originally Posted by Rob

Possibly different thread needed but got any fag packet maths on what the situation plus ten years would be?

100k pa rent to glyndwr v what?

I think a new thread would be a good idea, starting with BV's post.

[Phils-an-alki]

Originally Posted by LlayDragon

I think a new thread would be a good idea, starting with BV's post.

A thread with no villagers would be refreshing.

[Bagger Vance]

Originally Posted by Rob

Possibly different thread needed but got any fag packet maths on what the situation plus ten years would be?

100k pa rent to glyndwr v what?

From memory ground was £1.3m as a starting point, but we could have used same mechanism for Colliers as well at £500k and chose to let both go. 13 year payback on the ground but this could have been reduced by enhancing commercial offering and increasing non match day use.

Dual class shares isn’t radical - it’s how Wimbledon is set up.