Its all about money and we've got enough.

[pagl]

Originally Posted by John Neals Dynasty

Apparently Our next signing is going to be Donald Trump he was to be Ricketts assistant but he's pushed him out of the way... And he likes Holroyd & Carrington because he likes their haircuts.

Anyone not contributing to BTB or buying a season ticket will be banned from the club.
Posted via mobile theme

Yeh and any non welsh fans will not be tolerated and we will build a wall across the A483 and them we will meet up with Kim Il Duplo down the road and discuss peace terms

[crazywelsh]

Originally Posted by Big A

It works far better than communism....

Aslong as we have a club springs to mind.

[John Neals Dynasty]

Originally Posted by pagl

Yeh and any non welsh fans will not be tolerated and we will build a wall across the A483 and them we will meet up with Kim Il Duplo down the road and discuss peace terms

You heard that rumour to 😈
Posted via mobile theme

[fugazi3973]

Originally Posted by krux

How many of the 92 league clubs are fan owned? 5? 6?

of the 80 + that are privately owned, how many have turned sour?

And how many fan-owned clubs have gone sour.

Figures please, how many fan-owned clubs have gone into administration and/or bust compared to privately owned?

[fugazi3973]

Originally Posted by John Neals Dynasty

Don't confuse some with facts.
Posted via mobile theme

No facts were giving. Just opinion. For this to be 'factual' there needed to be something to judge the statement on. Like figures of fan-owned clubs going into administration or/and bust against privately owned clubs going into administration or/and bust.

[krux]

Originally Posted by fugazi3973

And how many fan-owned clubs have gone sour.

Figures please, how many fan-owned clubs have gone into administration and/or bust compared to privately owned?

The club going bust is not the problem with being fan owned though, is it?

Fan owned is a safety net, guarantees the club exists, but doesn't provide enough money for the club to thrive.

Being privately owned by a sugar daddy gives the club more money, but there is the risk of nefarious intent on behalf of the owner.

The trick is to get a rich owner without nefarious intent, or at least won't shaft the club if they choose to exit. for example, The Eastleigh sugar daddy has jacked it in, but he has not shafted them.

[krux]

Originally Posted by fugazi3973

No facts were giving. Just opinion. For this to be 'factual' there needed to be something to judge the statement on. Like figures of fan-owned clubs going into administration or/and bust against privately owned clubs going into administration or/and bust.

It is a fact that the overwhelming majority of privately owned football league clubs have not gone into administration.

Please tell me which part of that is not factually correct?

[fugazi3973]

Originally Posted by krux

It is a fact that the overwhelming majority of privately owned football league clubs have not gone into administration.

Please tell me which part of that is not factually correct?

That wasn't the point you brought up though is it? Before now moving the goalposts, you drew a comparison between the fan-owned and privately owned clubs when answering a question about financial aspects and due-diligence of private owners, not on-field success.

"How many of the 92 league clubs are fan owned? 5? 6?

of the 80 + that are privately owned, how many have turned sour?"

So, answering the point that YOU raised, I would say it is a fact that the overwhelming majority of clubs that have entered administration are privately owned, compared to fan-owned.

[fugazi3973]

Originally Posted by krux

The club going bust is not the problem with being fan owned though, is it?

Fan owned is a safety net, guarantees the club exists, but doesn't provide enough money for the club to thrive.

Being privately owned by a sugar daddy gives the club more money, but there is the risk of nefarious intent on behalf of the owner.

The trick is to get a rich owner without nefarious intent, or at least won't shaft the club if they choose to exit. for example, The Eastleigh sugar daddy has jacked it in, but he has not shafted them.

Exeter City have been majority fan-owned since 2003. Since then have got as high as 8th in League One. OK back in League Two now, but play-offs in the last two seasons. No sugar daddy steamrolling them there, and no sugar-daddy was in place when they got out of this league.