Dover (A) reaction thread

[GiggityGiggityGiggityGoo]

Originally Posted by John Neals Dynasty

Corruption at the top?
Posted via mobile theme

No, however beyondit consultancy limited accounts are interesting, no money seems to be going in our out, been around since 2015. Odd for a company with a very flash website too. This is separate again from what I've alluded to, I'll stress to add.

But according to Businness Wales have a turnover of between £250k - £500k and 1-5 employees. According to LinkedIn 3 people work for them.

Any accounting experts able to explain? Doesnt add up to me.
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09726213

[Percy Sugden]

Originally Posted by benwilliams

Would all these rumours of investors and explosive material have come out if we had won today?

I am still very optimistic about the season, firmly believe we would have won without Grant's brain fart. Very difficult to play away with ten v a team like Dover.

At least ruthers came on and shored up the defence....

[dixienormous]

Originally Posted by benwilliams

Would all these rumours of investors and explosive material have come out if we had won today?

I am still very optimistic about the season, firmly believe we would have won without Grant's brain fart. Very difficult to play away with ten v a team like Dover.

Yes I brought it up a couple of week ago.

[benwilliams]

Originally Posted by Percy Sugden

At least ruthers came on and shored up the defence....

Yes I'm pretty certain it's all his fault

[Percy Sugden]

Originally Posted by benwilliams

Yes I'm pretty certain it's all his fault

Right decision fetching him on???

[benwilliams]

Originally Posted by Percy Sugden

Right decision fetching him on???

Again 20 20 hindsight! I can see why they brought him on but ultimately we lost the game so that fits with your agenda. There were 9 other players who could be blamed and that's not forgetting the 1 who's fault it actually was putting us a man down.

I would be quite happy for Rutherford to not make the bench as I think he is one of our weaker players but equally I dont know why you want to pin all our ills on him alone.

[John Neals Dynasty]

Originally Posted by benwilliams

Again 20 20 hindsight! I can see why they brought him on but ultimately we lost the game so that fits with your agenda. There were 9 other players who could be blamed and that's not forgetting the 1 who's fault it actually was putting us a man down.

I would be quite happy for Rutherford to not make the bench as I think he is one of our weaker players but equally I dont know why you want to pin all our ills on him alone.

I agree and I don't think the blame can be a 100% down to Grants moment of madness. Their isn't any guarantee we would of won with 11 on the pitch, we threw a 2 goal lead away against Borehamwood with 11 men on the pitch and first half apparently against Barrow we could of been 2 or 3-0 down. . Maybe we aren't an improved side because we seem to have improved going forward but forgot how to defend. As I said earlier 3 games in a week of the season gone to early to judge yet should of sorted His starting 11 and formation earlier in pre-season hence not a settled side yet and I suspect we are missing Lainton our player of last season.
Posted via mobile theme

[Back of the Kop]

I think I need to find something else to do.

Supporting this club just stresses me out.

[John Neals Dynasty]

Originally Posted by Kiddy Dragon

Sir Jim Ratcliffe - he doesn't have a team in Wales (yet)

Is this a joke?
Posted via mobile theme