DEMAND CHANGE. An Open Letter Back to the Board

[-luke]

Originally Posted by -luke

On the contrary... Unless I interpreted this wrong, if the number of fans (as a proportion of paid up membership) is low enough, not a single EGM vote would count. I think either 50 or 75% have to vote for it to count?

I should really fact check myself on this so don't quote me

[cardiffred]

Originally Posted by -luke

On the contrary... Unless I interpreted this wrong, if the number of fans (as a proportion of paid up membership) is low enough, not a single EGM vote would count. I think either 50 or 75% have to vote for it to count?

First step - get the right people on the board. There is a massive opportunity coming up.

Depends what the vote is for. Most do not require 75% of the full membership to pass.

[cardiffred]

Originally Posted by -luke

I should really fact check myself on this so don't quote me

Too late.

[-luke]

Originally Posted by cardiffred

First step - get the right people on the board. There is a massive opportunity coming up.

Depends what the vote is for. Most do not require 75% of the full membership to pass.

AGM votes I think you are right

EGM votes I think I'm right

[3pmsaturday]

[QUOTE=WrexhamO;2358731]

Originally Posted by 3pmsaturday

the appalling treatment of the disabled supporter’s association, ? There is a thread on here that shows that it seems a route for inclusion is in place. That said again an AGM point that the Trust must meet the DSA with an independent Chair and minutes to be published is a great result.

A route for inclusion is not in place. Until resolution is made on the freedom of speech via social media and we have not had a reply to our last email in that regard.
And (in my personal opinion) with the club pushing on with platform 2 again now, when it seems that even some of the WST Board thought it was on hold, means we are as far away as ever.

The letter states that the DSA have been treated "appallingly". It transpires that a structure for a meeting is in place. The DSA stance was one that the Chair was a delaying tactic but now that the only issue is social media representation. As stated in the other thread release minutes post meeting. After that I would suggest you as the DSA could then say whatever you want on social media. Its cant be a lifetime ban just till that point (release of minutes).

[WrexhamO]

[QUOTE=3pmsaturday;2358875]

Originally Posted by WrexhamO

The letter states that the DSA have been treated "appallingly". It transpires that a structure for a meeting is in place. The DSA stance was one that the Chair was a delaying tactic but now that the only issue is social media representation. As stated in the other thread release minutes post meeting. After that I would suggest you as the DSA could then say whatever you want on social media. Its cant be a lifetime ban just till that point (release of minutes).

We are taking it as an ideterminite NDA of the event post meeting taking place. And the WST/WAFC are specifically referring to after the meeting in their emails, without reference to a period of time.