Wembley - The Board - Page 7 - RedPassion.co.uk

chef1 · 17th May 2019, 19.31:28

the last 2 seasons we had the money and opportunity to go up the boards constant failings made sure we didn't .

Bagger Vance · 17th May 2019, 20.09:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonesfach

What would an investor want back?

I’ve just put money into a games company set up by two of my developers - I’m not anticipating a return, it’s not my motivation for doing it, satisfaction of helping someone is. Sometimes people are happy with what they have financially and seek satisfaction through achievement, fun or just challenge. You make the rather sad assumption that everyone is after the next buck, there are many people who see life in a different way.

Liverpool Red · 17th May 2019, 20.28:46

The problem we have is that the people at the top apparently value the ideology of being fan owned and self financing above the best interests of the football club. As others have said previously, there are people who are fans of the WST in preference to being fans of the football club.

GarryOggy · 17th May 2019, 20.48:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liverpool Red

As others have said previously, there are people who are fans of the WST in preference to being fans of the football club.

Absolute nonsense.

Liverpool Red · 17th May 2019, 20.57:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by GarryOggy

Absolute nonsense.

What steps have they taken to seek investment in the club?

pagl · 17th May 2019, 21.15:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quay Red

Trying to co opt someone just to fill a quota seems silly.
Co opting or consulting people with relevant expertise is good.
Whether the board have consulted "experts" is debatable. Maybe they should just have looked on the poll for prospective managers on here and then blamed RP for any cock ups.

Is it about a quota though or more expertise and resource to do the current job.
How many times are we told there is only so much a limited number of volunteers can do to make a difference.

More people given more roles would be better, wouldnt it?

pagl · 17th May 2019, 21.18:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liverpool Red

The problem we have is that the people at the top apparently value the ideology of being fan owned and self financing above the best interests of the football club. As others have said previously, there are people who are fans of the WST in preference to being fans of the football club.

Its more they can only see 1 way. They are firmly in the WST regardless of whether its really best for the club.

Foxy · 17th May 2019, 21.23:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by GarryOggy

Absolute nonsense.

It’s really not nonsense. There is sadly a group of people running the club who are on an ideological mission . The fortunes of the club on the pitch are very much the second priority. We will not move forward until these people are gone.

Alan Attack · 17th May 2019, 21.36:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by pagl

Its more they can only see 1 way. They are firmly in the WST regardless of whether its really best for the club.

What’s the alternative?

17th May 2019, 19.31:28	#55-0 (permalink)
chef1 Club Captain Joined: Mar 2005 Racecourse Spot: Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: Wembley - The Board the last 2 seasons we had the money and opportunity to go up the boards constant failings made sure we didn't .

17th May 2019, 20.28:46	#57-0 (permalink)
Liverpool Red Cult Hero Joined: Jul 2012 Racecourse Spot: MRS Real Name: Twitter: @	Re: Wembley - The Board The problem we have is that the people at the top apparently value the ideology of being fan owned and self financing above the best interests of the football club. As others have said previously, there are people who are fans of the WST in preference to being fans of the football club.